Being in Software Development workforce for over 10 years, and in Android Development for a long time, I saw that various engineers has various qualities. Some are more grounded than the others in some angle.

Do look at which type you are in, or your individual colleague is…

I isolate them into 3 classes for example Innovation, Process and Product. From that point, I'll share every one of the quality, utilizing Android improvement phrasing as model for a few. These ascribes ought to applies to other programming designers excessively other than Android. Software development outsourcing team from Gravum prepared some list to read for you

Innovation

Engineer is a calling of learning and advancing. Stagnation would be lethal. Innovation advancement getting shorter and shorter, subsequently the at any rate one of following ascribes are basic to guarantee one to keep on being in this calling.

Pilgrim

Google I/O engineer gathering happens each year. As Android designer, on the off chance that you get energized and constantly needed to be the first to address what's declare (or for a few, even before it is reported), you unquestionably have this property. Starting today, you maybe has gone past Android advancement, and have address some AI related stuff (for example tensorflow) as well as AR/VR in someway. You wouldn't fret utilizing Android Studio canary adaptation while it is as yet being created. You may be as of now utilizing coroutine of Kotlin.

In the event that you haven't utilize Architecture Component (which was reported a year ago) and have not contact Kotlin (not alluding to adoring it), I figure you probably won't score yourselves great here.

Savant

You know MVVM, MVC and MVP and that's just the beginning, and ready to tell the contrasts between them plainly and decisively. Continuously think about the eventual fate of consider the possibility that for example imagine a scenario in which the information source is never again utilizing JSON. Abstracting some rationale away energizes you, however it may not required at this point. You have some solid trust in some methodology (for example Practical is should better then OOP or the other way around) and advance from case to instance of utilization. You have your sentiment on the most recent Architecture Component proposed by Google.

In the event that you don't get annoyed when you see some Android Framework object(e.g. setting) dwells in rationale bit of class, or see your movement or part having some perplexing rationale appears to be alright with you, at that point it's difficult to state you minds here. You would prefer to remain with one example or approach, so you could simply play safe, rather than need to reevaluate of reasonableness and refactor code to make a code engineering more pleasant.

Scholastic

You like something that looks extremely rich. for example incline toward utilizing RxJava as it looks substantially more exquisite than ordinary basic methodology. You like Functional Programming as not on the grounds that it streamlines and make things cleaner, yet in addition it is so cool. You would need to see single piece of it, and maybe have plunge into Android structure source code, to know how things are finished. 

On the off chance that you hasn't see how Dagger 2 functions, (not alluding to duplicate and glue utilizing it), I don't think you are very academical. You lean toward utilizing straightforward library to accomplish area discovery than keeping in touch with one yourselves.

Procedure

Over the 3 classifications, these regions maybe is least love by regular designer, in doing these themselves. They comprehend their significant for future manageability, and would truly cherish somebody to help in these zones or consider alternate ways to improve them (consequently the presentation of Agile Development, which disentangles numerous procedures 😉). In any case, as designer, these traits helps for one vocation advancement.

Recorder

To begin a card (story), you need each and every detail archived well. You would go the additional means to realize what's the acknowledgment criteria before beginning an undertaking. So as to guarantee QA could test your work, you'll record down each and every situation feasible for QA to pursue. In your code, remarks is something you wouldn't fret including. You lean toward new (cards) stories when you found another territory to take a shot at generating from your current work.

On the off chance that you favor coding than recording, and wouldn't fret no documentation, at that point you will be you are not a scriber. Your accept is code is the best documentation, however for the code you composed, you probably won't comprehend following 3 months. Read this article about pros and cons of working with dedicated teams

Language specialist

Naming variable, capacities and so on are most specific for you. On the off chance that conceivable you would lean toward capacities like fun enableClick() and fun disableClick() than a solitary fun enableClick(enable: Boolean). An additional room or additional lines in the code aggravates you. In your test work, you presumably not name it like fun testSomething(), however rather fun 'when set a then b ought to run'(). You likely have present checkStyle or detetk for your fabricate.

On the off chance that despite everything you use chief or industrial facility in your group name, and uses I or x for your variable name, you are most likely not a Linguist. You don't significantly try to squeeze Alt-Command-L or Ctrl-Option-O in IntelliJ for appropriate organizing before you submit your code.

Analyzer

To you, if there is no test for a code, it isn't working. You realize what is UiAutomator, Expresso well beside Junit. You wouldn't fret going the additional miles of making start to finish test and uses Amazon or Firebase test ranch, with the goal that you could rest better around evening time. You may likewise consider make your private capacity open if that is expected to make it testable. Utilizing Interface is liked, as you could ridicule them simpler for testing.

In the event that you didn't try composing test for your rationale code when check in for Peer Review, and figure the QA work force ought to have the option to discover issue on the off chance that it is there, at that point you are not an analyzer on a basic level. Regardless of whether you compose a test, you don't see the need to cause them to neglect to guarantee the test is working.

DevOps

Assemble time, mechanization, diminish manual exertion is the thing that you truly minds. You are an ace of a couple of content dialects, and Groovy is something under your sleeve. Docker is no more abnormal to you, and you likely have a decent arrangement of pictures that have all the required libraries set appropriately. You loathe fragile tests, and now and then question the need of running broad test all through. Friend Review procedure and GitFlow is all around controlled all the while so slip-up of combining is beyond the realm of imagination. iOS and Android advancement ought to be as predictable as could be allowed, so we could share the procedure.

In the event that you don't understand how a lot of time it takes to make your work to be accessible to QA to have that manufacture, at that point this isn't your territory. You wouldn't fret accomplishing things physically several time, rather than investing energy computerizing it. Read some answers on the question about countries for outsourcing software development

Item

While now and again this is dismissed by some engineer, it's seemingly this is the most significant class to guarantee the achievement of everything. Such insight is fundamental, as client concern would represents the moment of truth the undertaking. These properties would help focal point of what is important. On the off chance that one hoping to develop into chief of a group, such characteristics ought not need.

Planner

A solitary pixel diverse would concerns you. Activity isn't intended to flaunt, however need to have significant progress and regular. Your know about artist, cross pieces and action advances, and may have play around with Constraint Layout 2.0. You goes through hours thinking on symbols, hues, words, text styles and so on to be utilized. You would believe, is this element discoverable? Material Design is in your blood. Janky looking over is harming your eye. A card without an appropriate height will execute you.

You are not a planner engineer, in the event that you don't feel any unique when utilizing a local Android versus webView page. In the event that an architect gives you a proposition, you will never survey or scrutinize the structure. Rather, first things strike a chord is it innovation possibility. You'll propose a tradeoff if innovation isn't plausible from the start (without spiking it through first), regardless of whether the tradeoff implies not-as-decent a plan.

Quality Assurance

Crash is the exact opposite thing you need for the element you create. Your writing computer programs is exceptionally guarded. You think about far to send logs back for reports to know about the issue ahead. You'll turn on StrictMode in Android to uncover any potential issue. You'll run LeakCanary and if a memory dump is appeared, you'll chase it down till it is settled. 

In the event that you code variable!! in Kotlin, and that doesn't trouble you, you are unquestionably not having QA at the top of the priority list. Making a RXJava Subscription, you overlook you have to arrange it. At the point when you present another Fragment or Activity, you don't test it with don't keep movement to guarantee state rebuilding works appropriately.

Representative

To you, client is number 1. You like deft technique not on the grounds that it makes process less difficult, but since you could get your partners inputs always. You wouldn't fret code and having tech obligation card (story) to be done later, so as to guarantee we send things in a convenient way. You would prefer to code for what predictable need, than to abstracting the layer of code for an obscure future need. Systematic is essential to you, just as client input, to see how it is utilized. You adore A/B Testing, and wouldn't fret present switch inside the code, and job back when circumstance isn't required. No activity is fine in the event that it complete things and client get the chance to utilize it soon before rivalry does it. Business needs precede anything.

On the off chance that there's two alternatives of doing a component, one is quicker, the other is better, it's easy decision for you to go for the better one, despite the fact that there's client weight requiring that element, at that point you are not business disapproved. You abhor tech obligation would keep away from it at all expense. Decent activity and cool component is something to be transported despite the fact that nobody is probably going to utilize it.