As corporate overlords position independantly to seize what little remains of your tattered social net (adieu Medicare and Medicaid! Social Security? Au revoir! ), the Federal government is moving at break-neck rate to expand police point out programs first stood-up by the Bush government.

After most of, with world share price ranges gyrating wildly, employment and wages in a death spiral, and old age funds and publicly-owned possessions swallowed whole by speculators plus rentier scum, the condition better dust-off contingency plans lest the Greek, Spanish or British "contagion" distributed beyond the fabled shores of "old Europe" and also infect God-fearin' folk within the heimat.

Fear not necessarily, they have and that lyrically-titled Civil Disturbances: Emergency Employment of Army and other Resources, otherwise known as Army Regulation 500-50, spells available the "responsibilities, policy, and guidance for the Department in the Army in planning and operations involving the usage of Army resources in the actual control of actual or maybe anticipated civil disturbances. " (emphasis added)

With British politicians hard a clampdown on social websites in the wake associated with London riots, and with the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) agency having complied last week in San francisco, switching off underground cell phone service to help squelch a new protest against police physical violence, authoritarian control tactics, aping those deployed within Egypt and Tunisia (that worked out well! ) are becoming normative in so-called "Western democracies. "

Meanwhile up on Capitol Hill, Congress managed their part to secure us from that pesky Costs of Rights; that will be, before 81 of them--nearly any fifth of "our" selected representatives--checked-out for AIPAC-funded junkets in order to Israel.

Secrecy News reported the Senate Intelligence Committee "rejected an amendment that is going to have required the Attorney General along with the Director of National Intelligence to confront the situation of 'secret law, ' in which government agencies rely on legal authorities which have been unknown or misunderstood by public. "

That variation, proposed by Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) plus Mark Udall (D-CO) was rejected by voice vote, further entrenching unprecedented surveillance powers of Executive Branch agencies including the FBI and NSA.

While Antifascist Calling previously documented, the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a Freedom with Information Act lawsuit resistant to the Justice Department "demanding the release of a secret legal memo used to justify FBI access that will Americans' telephone records with virtually no legal process or oversight. "

The DOJ refused and it also now appears that this Senate has affirmed that "secret law" ought to be guiding principles of our own former republic.

Secrecy News also disclosed that this Committee rejected a second amendment to the authorization bill, one that would get required the Justice Department's Inspector General "to estimate the volume of Americans who have had the contents of the communications reviewed in violation belonging to the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 [FAA">. "

As pointed out here many times, FAA is really a pernicious piece of Bushist legislative detritus that legalized the last administration's secret spy applications since embellished by our current "hope and change" chief executive.

During the run-up that will FAA's passage, congressional Democrats, including then-Senator Barack Obama and also his Republican colleagues throughout the aisle, claimed that the law would "strike a balance" among Americans' privacy rights as well as the needs of security specialists to "stop terrorists" attacking the united states.

If that's the circumstance, then why can't the American people learn whether their rights happen to be compromised?

Perhaps, as recent reports in Truthout along with publications suggest, former OUGH. S. counterterrorism "czar" Richard Clarke equalized "explosive allegations against three former top CIA officials--George Tenet, Cofer Dark and Richard Blee--accusing these of knowingly withholding intelligence...about two of the 9/11 hijackers who had entered north america more than a year prior to attacks. "

Clarke's allegations follow closely within the heels of an study by Truthout journalists Jeffrey Kaye and also Jason Leopold.

"Based on on paperwork obtained under the Independence of Information Act and an interview with a former high-ranking counterterrorism recognized, " Kaye and Leopold acquired that "a little-known armed service intelligence unit, unbeknownst into the various investigative bodies probing this terrorist attacks, was ordered by senior government officials to prevent tracking Osama bin Packed and al-Qaeda's movements prior to 9/11. "

As audience are well aware, the 9/11 provocation was the pretext as used by the capitalist state to help wage aggressive resource wars abroad while ramming through repressive legislation such as the USA Patriot Act plus the FISA Amendments Act which targeted the democratic rights from the American people here at home.

But FAA did far more then legitimate illegal physical exercises. It also handed retroactive immunity and economic cover to be able to giant telecoms like AT&T plus Verizon who profited handily out of government surveillance, shielding them from monetary damages which can have resulted from some sort of spate of lawsuits for instance Hepting v. AT&T.

That raises the question: usually are other U. S. firms similarly shielded from overview by secret annexes inside FAA or the privacy-killing STATES Patriot Act?
https://www.raiwavoptic.com/Fiber-Optic-Patch-Cord-pl1989496.html